• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

NS: Fight fermenting - Law pits small businesses against NSLC

The Nova Scotia Liquor Corp. says it's merely upholding provincial law, which allows people to brew at home.

The Nova Scotia Liquor Corp. says it's merely upholding provincial law, which allows people to brew at home.

Published on January 30, 2013
Published on January 30, 2013
Melanie Patten  RSS Feed

Latest News

See All Articles

Regional News

See All Articles

The Canadian Press

Liberal Opposition leader Stephen McNeil is calling the liquor corp's legal move — to try and stop Wine Kitz in Halifax and Water 'n' Wine in New Glasgow from producing wine and beer in their stores — a 'heavy-handed' approach to stamp out entrepreneurial spirit.

Topics :
Nova Scotia Liquor , Canadian Federation of Independent Business , Nova Scotia Supreme Court , Nova Scotia , New Glasgow , Prince Edward Island

[HALIFAX, NS] - A Nova Scotia law dictating where hobbyists can make their own wine and beer has uncorked a torrent of condemnation among observers who say the provincial government is picking on the little guy.

The province's Crown liquor corporation is seeking a court order to stop the owners of Wine Kitz in Halifax and Water 'n' Wine in New Glasgow from producing wine and beer in their stores.

The Nova Scotia Liquor Corp. says it's merely upholding provincial law, which allows people to brew at home.

But Richard Dunn, a senior policy analyst with the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, said the law is anti-competitive and threatens the underpinnings of a free market.

"It's turf protection for the liquor corporation," he said. "And it comes at the expense of private enterprise."

Regulatory changes introduced by the provincial government in 2011 give the liquor corporation the authority to seek a court order to prevent businesses from allowing customers to use brew kits on their premises.

The owners of Wine Kitz Halifax and Water 'n' Wine in New Glasgow are contesting the injunction. The matter is scheduled to return to Nova Scotia Supreme Court next month.

According to the Nova Scotia government, in-store wine and beer production is permitted in five provinces: Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Ontario, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.

Nova Scotia's distinction as the only Maritime province to ban the practice has unleashed frustration and disbelief among many.

Dunn said he's not surprised by the public outcry.

"When you create that imbalance or unlevel playing field, it puts people's backs up," he said in an interview from Moncton, N.B.

Finance Minister Maureen MacDonald, the minister responsible for the Liquor Control Act, declined repeated requests for comment as the matter is before the courts.

Terri Mosher, a spokeswoman for Nova Scotia Liquor, said the corporation was upholding the interests of law-abiding businesses that wanted action taken against so-called U-vints and U-brews.

"For us, it really comes down to enforcing the act," she said.

Mosher said the court action was launched after the corporation hired investigators to pose as customers and make wine on-site last year. She declined to comment on any ongoing undercover efforts.

She said one of the corporation's main objections to in-store brewing was safety, not potential revenue loss.

"They're manufacturing unregulated product in a retail environment," she said.

Wine Kitz owner Ross Harrington defended his product, saying the corporation is simply flaunting its power.

He said the NDP government's reputation among entrepreneurs is being strained as a result.

"I think the public outcry is obvious," said Harrington. "The optics for the government are bad."

Liberal Opposition Leader Stephen McNeil said his party has repeatedly introduced bills in the legislature to protect businesses that offer in-store brewing, but to no avail.

"This is a heavy-handed approach being used by a Crown corporation to stamp out the entrepreneurial spirit of these Nova Scotians," McNeil said.

Progressive Conservative Leader Jamie Baillie has called for an overhaul of the province's liquor laws, starting with in-store brewing — or "regulation gone crazy", as he put it.

"With all the issues our province has, I can't believe the NDP has decided that squashing small independent business people and hobbyists ... is an important priority," Baillie said.

Dunn said Nova Scotia has lost the momentum it gained in recent years in cutting red tape for small businesses. He said the U-vint and U-brew "nonsense" is only compounding the province's economic woes.

The federation recently gave the province a grade of D for its efforts to slash red tape in an annual report card.

Dunn said heaping the bureaucratic burden on small enterprises could scare off potential entrepreneurs if it continues to happen.

"You're not building the confidence of the business community by coming out with these barriers," he said. "If it becomes a pattern ... you're going to have people thinking twice about either relocating to Nova Scotia or perhaps trying to start up a business of their own."

*Editor's Note: Check out the latest update to this story — "Nova Scotia does 'about face' — Stores able to brew wine, beer on site"

CLICK HERE

Comments

  • Username
    graham woodhall
    - January 30, 2013 at 23:08:18

    Why Are Monopolies Bad? Since monopolies are the only provider, they can set pretty much any price they choose. This is known as price-fixing. They can pretty much do this, regardless of demand, because they know the consumer has no choice. This is especially true for goods and services where there is inelastic demand, where people don't have a lot of flexibility. An example of this is gasoline. There are choices, such as mass transit or bicycles, but they aren't an easy substitute in many areas. Not only can monopolies raise prices, they can also supply inferior products. This has happened in some urban areas, where grocery stores know that the poor urban dweller has fewer alternatives. Monopolies are also bad for an economy because the manufacturer has no incentive to innovate, and provide "new and improved" products. This used to be true of cable companies. It was expensive to lay new cable, so residents had to accept the cable company's service and prices. However, disruptive technology is the worst enemy of monopolies. Dish TV, iPads, and Netflix has created a new type of entertainment service that doesn't rely on cable to deliver movies and TV programming. The same thing happened with land-line telephones. Another reasons monopolies are bad is that they can create inflation. Since they can set any price they want, they will raise costs to consumers. This is known as cost-push inflation.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Chris
    - January 30, 2013 at 12:35:04

    NSLC is doing nothing more than ensuring they maintain a monopoly. They can hide it behind numerous excuses (safety, upholding interests of law-abiding business, etc.), but the reality is that it all comes down to money and they're afraid that these businesses are taking money from them. What is worse is that it's our money paying to fight this ridiculous battle. As if it isn't enough that we pay higher wages to unionized employees doing the same job as a Sobey's cashier, paying for loyalty programs like Airmiles (why does a monopoly need a loyalty program?), and paying for advertising efforts (again, why does a monopoly need to advertise)! If we the people want to investigate something I suggest it should be the manner in which NSLC is spending OUR money!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Judy Lake
    - January 30, 2013 at 12:24:58

    A very stupid fight to pick - even the most politically unaware Nova Scotian will wonder why this very over regulated sector wants to be less user friendly and get the populace annoyed at NDippers There are lots of examples of specific NS laws not being enforced so an inquiring mind would wonder, why risk the backlash for something the populace can understand?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Steven Haynes
    - January 30, 2013 at 12:12:10

    I find it interesting that both the Liberal and the PC party had opportunities to allow U-Vints when they were in government but now are screaming that it's not fair to small business. In 2003 the PC government was petitioned to allow U-Vints and they said no citing "the potentially negative economic and regulatory implications" as their reasoning. Now all of a sudden, it's a great idea! Why does it always seem that it's easier to back 'the little guy' when you are NOT in power?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jamie Myra
    - January 30, 2013 at 12:11:25

    This whole thing is ridiculous, I thought this Government was all about "Small Business" but now we see who they are really supportive of. What a great way for the Liquor Coorporation to spend there tax dollars that they get from NSLC sales.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Advertising